Arguments For And Against A System Of Proportional Representation For Westminister Elections

1235 words - 5 pages

For Westminster elections the present electoral system is called
first-past-the-post (FPTP) which is considered as unfair and
undemocratic in many aspects, such as giving a disproportionate number
of seats to parties for their percentage of votes received. So the
issue of electoral reform to a proportional representation (PR) system
which is used throughout Europe has arisen. Under a PR electoral
system, a party's seats in the House of Commons would be, more or
less, in proportion to the votes cast this party gets in the general
election, depending on the type of PR system used. PR electoral
systems have many supporters, and they indeed have many advantages to
replace the present system.

PR systems are seen as more representative than FPTP system mainly
because the percentage of seats in the legislature is proportional to
the votes cast, so more voters' wishes are represented, especially
with the free list system which is seen as the most representative
form of PR system, because it allows the voter to cast up a certain
number of votes to vote the candidates in different parties.

In the FPTP system, because one particular party can be virtually
certain to win regardless of the candidate in many constituencies, and
it forms "safe seats" in the House of Commons, which leads to low
turnout in a general election, and a lot of votes are wasted because
the winning party just needs one more vote than any other party. Under
a PR system, especially the Single Transferable vote form, all the
surplus votes are shared to other candidates in proportion, and this
process will be continued until all the seats are filled. Thus when
voters feel their votes will not be wasted, the turnouts will be
automatically higher, meanwhile more people's wishes are represented.

The FPTP system is unfair for small parties. For example, in the
1980s, the Liberal Democratic party got about 25 per cent of the votes
but only gained about 3 per cent of the seats in the House of Commons.
Thus the Liberal Democratics are the main advocates of a PR system,
because under PR, they can gain far more seats, and be in a better
position to bargain with the main parties. If many small parties can
gain seats in proportional to their votes, it is more likely to create
a hung Parliament in which no party has a majority of seats. From the
Liberal Democratics' view, this can be seen as a good thing, for it
may curb "elective dictatorship" (to use Lord Hailsham's phrase), and
because of the competition among parties, MPs may work harder with
high attendance in the House of Commons.

In October 1997, Lord Jenkins in his report (an Independent Commission
on the Voting System) advocated a system of AVPLUS. (Moyra Grant 1999,
P.46) Under this system, 80-85 per cent of MPs are elected in
single-member constituencies, and a top...

Find Another Essay On Arguments For and Against a System of Proportional Representation for Westminister Elections

Arguments for and Against Abortion Essay

2425 words - 10 pages Arguments for and Against Abortion An abortion is also known as a termination, meaning to terminate, to stop. An abortion is when you stop a pregnancy, by removing the foetus from the womb. Many people frown upon abortions, as they see them as the killing of a life. Other people believe that it is a ‘potential’ life, and that a foetus is not considered to be a child. Some people feel that in a situation

Arguments For And Against Euthanasia Essay

2001 words - 8 pages expedite the dying process. This paper is going to explore how euthanasia is viewed from religious and ethical points. Arguments for and against euthanasia will be presented using published research articles. In the United States, euthanasia is illegal in all states except in the states of Oregon, Washington, and Montana. In 1998 the issue of euthanasia was triggered in America when Dr Jack Kevorkian, a pathologist from Michigan showed

UK and the System of PR for General Elections

3254 words - 13 pages preferences would win. However, the supplementary vote has only a marginally more proportional effect than the first-past-the-post system, so it would hardly be worth introducing it. The Second Ballot System allows voters to vote in light of how others voted. However, it is not proportional and does not allow for smaller parties to get fair representation. The system discourages voters because they have to turnout twice and

A Look at the Arguments for and Against Censorship

1681 words - 7 pages form a distinct opinion on censorship given the arguments for both sides. The decision of whether or not to place restrictions on books, television, the internet, etc. impacts all corners of the world. Censorship has had a large influence on US history and will continue to affect its future. Works Cited “Censorship.” Current Issues: Macmillian Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. N. pag. Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 13

The question of abortion: the issue, arguments for and against

2360 words - 9 pages 1. IntroductionAbortion is one of the most controversial moral issues that has become the center of discussion in our contemporary society. This issue has raised strong arguments, and for some people simply to mention 'abortion' is to stir up emotions. In this essay, I will present both sides of the argument: in favor and against. To take a closer look at this issue, I will discuss the arguments of Judith Jarvis Thomson, Michael Tooley, Don

Arguments for and against an australian bill of rights

646 words - 3 pages There is an ever increasing need for enactment of a bill of rights in Australia. The recent judicial activism by the high court in favourably applying international human rights treaties against both common and statute law, to the anger of the cth government demonstrates a need to expressly state what rights the law is willing to bestow upon Australians.Kirby argues that the Dietrich v R, Mabo (No 2) and ACT v Cth all show an intention of the

Common Arguments For and Against Trade Restrictions

497 words - 2 pages Common Arguments For and Against Trade RestrictionsWhat are some of the common arguments for and against trade restrictions? Choose a position and describe why you think it is valid. Respond to a classmate who has selected a position that is different from yours. Did they provide valid rationale for their position? Why or why not?Arguments for trade restrictions include but are not limited to:•Trade restrictions protect domestic (home

Arguments for and Against Affirmative Action

1161 words - 5 pages Supreme Court in the early 1970s, the goal was to empower individuals not any specific racial groups. Over time the goals shifted from equality among the masses to diversity, which brings forth the issue at hand. Many have disputed and a clear point of view is still at bay. Does a systematic process of diversifying the workplace and universities truly bring equality? One of the strongest arguments against this selective process according to a

Arguments for and against gay marriage

600 words - 2 pages forms of gay marriage have been legal for years. Polling results show that most people there now recognize that the benefits far outweigh the trivial costs, and that far from threatening heterosexual marriage, gay marriage has actually strengthened it. This is simply a scare tactic used to make the ending result seem so horrid that people will not be willing to make the first step.Another thing that homosexuals having going against them are

Every Voice Heard: The Case for Proportional Representation

2584 words - 10 pages voting-system arrangements alter the incentives that voters and parties face to do certain things: to vote for one party over another, to try to appeal to one group of voters over another, and so on (Pilon 12)6. One of the main benefits that countries which have opted for proportional representation have noticed is an undeniable increase in voter turnout. In a political democracy citizen engagement is incredibly important. In situations where a

Arguments For and Against the Reintroduction of the Death Penalty for Murder

1924 words - 8 pages Arguments For and Against the Reintroduction of the Death Penalty for Murder The death penalty was abolished in the United Kingdom in 1965. (Blackwell 1968.) The abolishment of the death penalty was not a simple case. Since 1957 the issue had been before the House of Commons more than 19 times. However the death penalty is still used today in many countries across the world. During the year 2000 at least

Similar Essays

Should British Elections Use Proportional Representation?

2466 words - 10 pages Should British General Elections be conducted using a system of Proportional Representation? As the results came in for the 2010 election, it became pretty clear that the First Past The Post system had failed to give us a conclusive answer as to which party should be the next to form government and, as a result, we ended up with the first

A Vote Is A Vote: A Plea For Proportional Representation

2852 words - 11 pages our form of elections. The United States, Canada, and Great Britain are the only Western democracies that refuse to let go of their archaic winner-takes-all electoral systems. Support for the plurality system has deteriorated worldwide because it has a number of serious drawbacks. It routinely denies representation to large numbers of voters, produces legislatures that fail to accurately reflect the views of the public, discriminates against third

Arguments For And Against Liposuction Essay

601 words - 3 pages Arguments for and against the liposuction Liposuction is one of the most effective ways of figure correction. Liposuction has its advantages and disadvantages. Liposuction is one of the most popular surgery operations. This ia an effective technique of removal of local excess of fat. It is not aimed on the removing of all the fat from the human body. Nowadays, there are following types of fat removal: liposuction of the abdomen, thigh

Arguments For And Against Waiver Essay

1080 words - 4 pages statistical facts showing why waiver can be a very debatable topic within the juvenile criminal justice system. In its totality it will discuss the arguments for and against waiver. The age of the offender determines whether they meet the requirements for a judicial waiver offense. With that said not every state offers all three of the methods a juvenile can qualify for a waiver. In the process of judicial waiver offense the judge takes the final