The Near Death Experience (NDE) is a very debatable topic. There are a lot of people who simply do not believe in an afterlife let alone a NDE, and everything else that comes along with it. But on the other hand, there are several people who believe in the NDE and an after life and that the body dies but the soul survives and lives on in another shape or form. This is a very controversial topic because the words used to describe the NDE are very broad. The words can have several meanings, or simply aren't able to be explained in better details.
When we discuss a NDE, we have to take a lot into mind. The words we chose to use can be very crucial and either convincing or not convincing enough. When we speak of evidence, what we mean is actual data collected from the person who has had a NDE. Now, it is understandable to think that the data of the NDE that the person had is false, that they are making it up it never happened. But for people to encounter a NDE, from different places and at different times, and describe the exact same phenomena, is really hard to believe that they are lying, when there is no possible physical connection between those people, so they can enter act with each other. Especially with smaller children, for them to describe something that nobody would even think of, or describe something an adult experience from far away is pretty convincing.
In the book "Dying to live", by Susan Blackmore, she picks out NDE from people
all over the world, and tries to explain the phenomena by simple using biology and chemical imbalances, problems to the body. She doesn't believe in NDE, but believes because the body undergoes certain chemical imbalances, stress, mind difficulties, etc, that the brain can play tricks on people making them hallucinate. For instance, in the case of a 27 year old woman who was having heart failure, was describing a light t the end of the tunnel "I seemed to see a bright white light at the end of a long tunnel...I couldn't get to it before the effects of the gas wore off" (Blackmore, 67). She claims the gas was carbon dioxide, that the tunnel was not a NDE, or anything death related, in fact it was the effects of gas on the brain causing hallucinations.
To me it's kind of weird to think that the tunnel experience was just a reaction to the gas in the brain as hallucinations. Especially since not every person in the world who has had a NDE was in the exact same situation using the same type of gases, can experience the exact same thing. I think it's more spiritual and it's a great phenomenon that cannot be always explained physically. Something's are easier to except than others and are easier to explain as well. It all depends on the persons beliefs and how they view things.
Another big debatable NDE is the life review. It seems to occur with every NDE; some life reviews are a little harsh or none at all, while others are reported as being terrifying and hellish. For example "When the light appeared, the first...