Regional Analysis: North American Free Trade Agreement

1527 words - 6 pages

Regional Analysis: North American Free Trade Agreement
In today's globalized economies, virtually every country in the world belongs to some form of regional integrated trade organization whether by direct membership, bilateral or multilateral agreement. Regional integration is a process by which sovereign states in a particular region enter into an agreement to promote economic growth through the reduction of barriers to trade restrictions and safeguard common interests such as the environment. The removal of trade barriers results in a free trade zone thus creating a single market. Sovereign nations have many differences, some may be more economically sound and others may have a greater labor force or better technology. In the end, all regional nations must find a method to work together for the common good of all parties. The development of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was to solidify the nations occupying the North American continent, Canada, the United States (U.S.) and Mexico. Many proponents question the success of NAFTA for these nations. This essay will examine the advantages and disadvantages of regional integration and the regional economic development of these nations as members of NAFTA.
NAFTA is trade agreement implemented January 1, 1994 between the U.S., Canada and Mexico which removes restrictions on trade between the three countries to encourage free competition, improve investment opportunities and increase market access "for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)" (Tomasetti, H., 2004). Some of the advantages NAFTA has afforded its members are the eradication of tariffs, product price reductions and increased profit margins. NAFTA has eliminated tariffs on all goods traded between the U.S. and Canada and Mexico as of January 1, 2008. By reducing the tariff rate on goods or final products allows SMEs to reduce their selling price thus keeping them competitive with non-NAFTA goods sold at a higher price due to imposed tariffs and allows the SMEs to compete with larger organizations within the region. For example, a wool area carpet from Mexico sells at $60 and a wool carpet from Thailand sells at $50, both countries must pay a tariff of $15. Removing the tariff rate on Mexican goods will encourage consumers to purchase the Mexican goods versus the Thailand goods.
Another advantage of regional integration is the increase in sales. According to reports from the U.S. Department of Commerce, trade between the NAFTA countries has increased 200% and members of NAFTA have purchased a greater number of U.S. products and exports than was purchased in Europe. In addition, since the implementation of NAFTA the number of SMEs has tripled due to the increased demand for products within the region. An increase in supply demand means an increase in sales thus requiring an increase in production or manufacturing and an increase in wages for workers. For the NAFTA region, U.S. manufacturing rose 44%,...

Find Another Essay On Regional Analysis: North American Free Trade Agreement

Central American Free Trade Agreement Essay

782 words - 3 pages the United States, more than 750,000 manufacturing jobs have been lost since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and were replaced by low-wage service jobs. Working conditions in Mexico have deteriorated substantially with the maquila (sweatshops) sector as the primary source of new jobs: the median salary has lost 23% of its purchasing power, and 8 million more Mexican families live in poverty than before NAFTA went into effect. Not

Has the North American Free Trade Agreement Hurt the American Economy?

1005 words - 4 pages taking advantage of Mexico’s free trade agreement with the U.S. (Bethel University, 2006). Perched in his ivory tower and arguing for the defense of NAFTA is Daniel T. Griswold, who takes the view that NAFTA was both “an economic and foreign policy success” (Bethel University, 2006, p.286). Amazingly, in my view, Griswold takes the position that “NAFTA was more about foreign policy than about the domestic economy. Its biggest payoff…has been

The European Union (EU) vs the North American Free Trade Agreement

3368 words - 13 pages The European Union (EU) vs the North American Free Trade Agreement Introduction The European Union (EU) is the organization which integrates the countries listed below, both politically and economically. It is a customs union, which is an agreement amongst a group of countries to eliminate trade barriers between them on the movement of goods, services, labor and capital, and also to establish a common external tariff on goods and

Free Trade Agreement (FTA)

1093 words - 4 pages systems of FTA. The NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement); this began on Jan. 1, 1994. This agreement will remove most barriers to trade investment among the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Under NAFTA, all non-tariff barriers to agricultural trade between the United States and Mexico were eliminated. In addition, many tariffs were eliminated immediately, with others being phase out over periods of 5 to 15 years. Although U.S

Free Trade Agreement

2785 words - 11 pages as North- American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA), U.S.- Singapore Free Trade Agreement (USSFTA), etc. Specifically, one of the longest standing of FTA is existing between Australia and New Zealand (ANZCER) - more than 20 years, known as the "Closer Economic Relationship" delivering economic benefits to both countries. Then Australia also has concluded two FTAs with Asian trading partners in

Marketing of Honda motorcycles in the USA The North Americam Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)

2020 words - 8 pages . Unfortuneatly, despite the solidity that our economy is so often associated with, we have accumulated a 5 trillion dollar (that's 9 zeros) national debt. Something has to be done about this colossal problem to ensure that the United States retains its status as a world power in the global economy. One vital catalyst to help promote growth and neutralize the massive account deficit and foreign debts is the North American Free Trade Agreement. NAFTA, for

European Union and the North American Free Trade

3022 words - 12 pages /law-and-ethics/similarities-differences-nafta-european-union-main-similarity-agreements-involve-single-approach-trade-countries-illustrate-explain/. [Accessed 01 December 2013 http://www.naftanow.org . 2013. North American Free Trade Agreement | The Agreement | NAFTANow.org. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.naftanow.org/agreement/default_en.asp. [Accessed 03 December 2013] http://www.oxfam.org. 2008. Regional Trade Agreements. [ONLINE] Available

Implications and Issues of the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement

3374 words - 13 pages to date suggests there has been little diversion and that FTAs and regional agreements have been effective in encouraging wider trade liberalisation. A study of the impact of North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade 2000) concluded that there was no evidence that the agreement had had diversionary effects. According to Professor Krueger (1999), the bulk of Mexican products that increased output/exports

A Free-Trade Agreement Between the US and Europe

1745 words - 7 pages a main buyer. After a tariff reclassification in 1999, the Chilean price band system (PBS) resulted in higher customs duties of up to 64.41%, thus violating the limit set at 31.5%. As a result, this issue was submitted to the WTO . c) U.S and Europe A free-trade agreement between the United States and Europe has been elusive for years. However, with the recent election of President Barack Obama in 2012, European Leaders like Angela Merkel and

The WTO role in the Australia and US free trade agreement

1925 words - 8 pages trade barriers should be applied, on a most-favoured nation basis, to all WTO members. This means that no WTO member should be discriminated against by another member's trade regime (DFAT 2004).In recent years there has been a pursuit of bilateral and regional trade agreements. Among the most well known include The European Union (EU)The European Free Trade Association (EFTA), The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), The Southern Common

Question: "A bilateral free trade agreement between the USA and Australia is likely to be of only marginal benefit to Australian businesses." Evaluate this statement

2145 words - 9 pages into the business economy of the multilateral trading system, and Australian domestic trade policy is taken into account, the economic effect can be expected to be strongly negative. A bilateral free trade agreement between the USA and Australia is likely to be of marginal or no benefit to Australian businesses.BibliographyAlbinski, H.S. 2002, "An Australia-US free trade agreement in alliance context", AQ, Journal of Contemporary Analysis, v.74

Similar Essays

North American Free Trade Agreement: Nafta

1615 words - 6 pages North American Free Trade Agreement: NAFTA Introduction      I believe that the North American Free Trade Agreement was an inevitable step in the evolution of the United States economic policy. The globilization of the world economy due to technological advances in computers and communications have shrunk the world to the point where no single country acting alone can effectively compete on the foreign market. Even

North American Free Trade Agreement (Nafta)

2079 words - 9 pages NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (NAFTA) Brief Overview: NAFTA, The North American Free Trade Agreement, came into existence on January 1, 1994. NAFTA is essentially a free-trade agreement between the 3 North American nations of the Unites States, Canada, and Mexico. The major thought behind this treaty was to give the citizens and the companies of the North American nations many incentives to trade between themselves. The duties on U.S

The North American Free Trade Agreement

3714 words - 15 pages The North American Free Trade Agreement NAFTA's proponents promised benefits for the U.S., Canada and Mexico. Benefits such as new U.S. jobs, higher wages in Mexico, a growing U.S. trade surplus with Mexico, environmental clean-up and improved health along the border—all have failed to take form. It is commonly believed that free trade between nations is a mutually beneficial arrangement for all parties involved; indeed

The Negative Effects Of The North American Free Trade Agreement

1211 words - 5 pages The Negative Effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement In January 1994, the United States, Mexico, and Canada implemented the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), forming the largest free trade zone in the world. The goal of NAFTA is to create better trading conditions through tariff reduction, removal of investment barriers, and improvement of intellectual property protection. NAFTA continues to gradually reduce