Project Evaluation Using Capm Essay

1753 words - 7 pages

Data:Company: Sportball PlcProducts :Footballs and basketballsCapital to invest :£ 100.000Project 1: Manufacture ShoesProject 2:Manufacture ShirtsProjectRevenues1st Year2nd Year3rd YearShoes £ 80,000 £ 75,000 £ 25,000Shirts £ 60,000 £ 50,000 £ 50,000Rate on a Gov Bond(The risk-free rate):5%FTSE 100 (Expected rate of the market):8%Sportball's ?:0.90Shoes Leader's ?:0.95Shirts Leader's ?:1.1a)Which project should Sportball plc choose?In order to be able to decide anyone of the projects, first of all we must analyze the ß previously that we will choose to evaluate.Therefore, we have to be very careful in this decision, since on this, could depend the success of the project evaluation.To choose the appropriate beta, we must study in what segment or sector " Sportball Plc " is going to get in, since this will give us the risk parameter beta, thus to calculate the correct expected rate to make our analysis.Assumption 1: As the company will get into a new branch of the sport accessories, which could be the Sport shoes or Sport Shirts, we will use the ? of each industry to calculate the expected rate and then determinate the feasibility of the projects:However as illustration, it will show how would be the appraisal with Sportball's ?:Market -risk premiumWe call Market -Risk premium to the difference between the expected rate of the market and the risk free rate so 0.08 - 0.05 = 0.03Where 0.03 will be our Market -Risk premium to evaluate de projects.Calculating the Expected RatesWe know that the expected return on the stock, using CAPM, is:Using Sportball's ß (0.90) will have:= 7.70 % (1)Using Shoes leader's ß (0.95) will have:= 7.85 % (2)Using Shirts leader's ß (1.1) will have:= 8.30 % (3)Project EvaluationUsing Sportball's ß=0.90, = 7.70%:SHOES PROJECT 1PeriodDF( )Cash FlowPV01-£ 100,000 -£ 100,00010.9285 £ 80,000 £ 74,28020.8621 £ 75,000 £ 64,65930.8005 £ 25,000 £ 20,012NPV£ 58,952IRR 44.09%SHIRTS PROJECT 2PeriodDF( )Cash FlowPV01-£ 100,000 -£ 100,00010.9285 £ 60,000 £ 55,71020.8621 £ 50,000 £ 43,10630.8005 £ 50,000 £ 40,024NPV£ 38,841IRR28.89%Here we can see clearly, that both of them have a positive NPV and a higher rate or return than the expected.Assumption 2: As the company has just £100.000 to invest in the new project, we have to choose the one which creates a higher value to investors or shareholders, thus in this case we would take the project 1, manufacturer Sport Shoes, because its NPV and IRR.Assumption 3: Now we will evaluate the projects with ? and the rate of each market leader respectively:Using the market shoes leader's ß=0.95 and = 7.85%:SHOES PROJECT (1)PeriodDF( )Cash FlowPV01-£ 100,000 -£ 100,00010.9272 £ 80,000 £ 74,17720.8597 £ 75,000 £ 64,47930.7971 £ 25,000 £ 19,929NPV£...

Find Another Essay On Project Evaluation - Using CAPM

Should You Invest in Enterprise Project Management?

1025 words - 5 pages include: “achievement of strategic business objectives through selecting the right projects at the right time; better throughput across all projects due to clear priorities, a clear understanding of resource capacity and the right staging of projects within a program and or a portfolio; improvement of decision making about individual projects by using a project portfolio context; and linking projects to various financial facets and increasing focus

Financial theory and Corporate Policy Essay

2126 words - 9 pages index from the 1st of January 2009 all up to the 1st of February 2014. Furthermore, the risk free rate data over this period of time would be used in the analysis. The business and sector in which each company is involved in is highlighted so that the return and the risk involved will be evaluated based on the following criteria, which include the average return, standard deviation, Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) Beta, Sharpe ratio, the

Mutual Fund Performance in Bull and Bear Market: The Case of Pakistani Mutual Fund

3254 words - 13 pages PSMF -0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0.03 -0.04 -0.03 SMFL -0.02 -0.04 -0.03 0.01 -0.002 -0.042 UGIF -0.001 -0.021 -0.01 -0.02 -0.04 -0.01 UIF -0.04* -0.01 -0.04 -0.01 -0.04 -0.01 UTP -0.04* -0.01 -0.04 -0.01 -0.04 0 The results reports in table 7 Jenson Alpha in bull and bear market in using all three models, CAPM, Fama French, Carhart models. The results indicates that by using the CAPM model the 7 out of 28

Weiner Chronicles

649 words - 3 pages (strategic vs operational) of the investment.orSurvey participants differed in their calculations of the cost of capital and equity but an overwhelming majority use WACC and the CAPM. Participants differed on the intricacies of these two equations in the following ways:No consensus on reference rate, 90-day t-bills vs long term Treasury bond yields50% use published beta, Other half calculates or uses fundamental BetaCorporations split between using

An Overview of Evaluating and Terminating a Project

1241 words - 5 pages An Overview of Evaluating and Terminating a Project The eighth chapter in the textbook takes a look at what goes into evaluating and terminating a project (Mantel 272-290). Evaluation and termination are the final stages of a project. Evaluation of a project looks at “the progress and performance relative to the project’s initial or revised plan” (Mantel 272). This should be done at the end of the project, but it is also important to

Nike Inc. Case

1702 words - 7 pages return at similar risk levels. Secondly, if the project is big enough and reflect the total activities of a company the cost of capital of said project is efficiently estimated with the WACC.Methodology for Calculating the WACCThe first mistake of Ms. Cohen is using the book value of equity instead of the market capitalization when calculating the weights in the WACC. It is possible to calculate the market capitalization given that we have the

Nike Inc. Case

2073 words - 9 pages return at similar risk levels. Secondly, if the project is big enough and reflect the total activities of a company the cost of capital of said project is efficiently estimated with the WACC.Methodology for Calculating the WACCThe first mistake of Ms. Cohen is using the book value of equity instead of the market capitalization when calculating the weights in the WACC. It is possible to calculate the market capitalization given that we have the

Nike, Inc

1297 words - 5 pages stock since the firm must pay investment bankers to sell (or float) the issue. In this case, the company redeemable preferred stock was closed to 0. So, we can ignored in calculating cost of preferred stock.3. The Cost of Common Equity (Ks)Using the constant growth model, we have:kR = (D1/P0) + g.We can also estimate the cost of common equity using the CAPM:Ks = Rf + Beta (Km - rF)The CAPM differs from dividend valuation models in that it explicitly

WACC Solution

763 words - 3 pages capital for a project?Ameritrade does not have a beta estimate because the firm has been publicly traded for only a short time period. Exhibit 4 provides various choices of comparable firms. What comparable firms do you recommend as the appropriate benchmarks for evaluating the risk of Ameritrade's planned advertising and technology investments?Using the stock price and returns data in Exhibits 4 and 5, and the capital structure information in

Evaluation Portion of Group Project

1101 words - 4 pages required is also essential. According to Oermann and Gaberson (2006, p. 3), evaluations can be formative and summative, and both of them fit into the following flow of the project development: This section will follow the above presented sequence of steps and place formative evaluation details before the finalizing steps taken in the process of the summative evaluation of the eICU implementation. Formative Evaluation Scholarly Views

The Risk Management Process

1973 words - 8 pages project. SWOT analysis offers a framework with which to conduct a brainstorming session, sticky-note exercise, or a Delphi Technique session (Fleming, 2005). The ending result of the risk identification phase would result in a list of possible risk that will have an adverse effect on the project at hand (Hilson, 2003). Using the variety of techniques or methods to identify risk allows the project management team to approach the next step in the risk

Similar Essays

Growth And Development Of The Capital Asset Pricing Model

2486 words - 10 pages the potential outcomes associated and comparative benefits and risks for using the CAPM versus the Arbitrage pricing theory (APT). Evaluating the development of the Capital Asset pricing Model (CAPM) How should the risk of an investment, affect its expected return (Perold, 2004)? According to Perold (2004) the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) was the first coherent framework developed by Sharpe, Lintner and Mossin in 1964, 1965 and 1966

Dividend Growth Model, Capital Asset Pricing Model, Modern Portfolio Theory, Estimation Of Untraded Stocks

1248 words - 5 pages are fixed, and that the market is efficient and in equilibrium with no inflation or change in the interest rate. CAPM additionally makes the important assumption that the evaluated stock is properly priced and that the risk level has been properly assessed.Another major assumption is that there are no taxes, transaction fees, or arbitrage opportunities during the evaluation period. This is a huge assumption which is generally incorrect. Almost

Financial Management Stock Market Entity Performance Comparison

6445 words - 26 pages Table of Contents31.0 Introduction 32.0 Task 1: Stock Performance vs. market performance 32.1 Comparison of Alufab stock performance with Market performance 82.2 Ratio comparison for AluFab 2010 - 2011 ( Evaluation of the Financial Performance of the company 92.3 Conclusion 93.0 Task 2 - Capital Asset Pricing Model. 93.1 The Relevance of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) to investors 113.2 CAPM Calculation 123.2.1 Price per Share

Nike : Cost Of Capital Essay

2297 words - 9 pages market is not stable, so the equity risk premium Km-Krf is hard to accurately find. Secondly, although CAPM takes risk factor into account by using beta to adjust the return premium, the beta is not always constant, from where additionally incurs inaccuracy.On the other hand, DGM simply use dividend growth rate and share price to calculate the cost of equity, not risk factors are taken into account. As a matter of fact, market risk both