This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Whether Euthanasia Should Be Legalized For Terminally Ill Patients In China

1140 words - 5 pages

With progressive maturity of the technology of euthanasia, whether euthanasia should be legalized for terminally ill patients has provoked widespread interest, especially after the exposure of such cases to the public [1]. Euthanasia, according to the definition given by Yun et al. [2], refers to the medical practice of injecting mortal dose of medication with the initial motive of ending a patient’s life. Opinions vary from person to person with regard to religious belief, age and sex [2]. While some people argue that euthanasia can reduce the misery of patients and relieve the burden of his or her family, others maintain that euthanasia is not ethical and may trigger quite a few problems. ...view middle of the document...

The knowledge and experience of a doctor are elements that affect his judgment to the status of patients as well. Therefore, it may sometimes be hard to precisely draw a line whether a patient can be considered terminally ill and is applicable to legal euthanasia if euthanasia is legalized for terminally ill patients. If the line is not clear enough, some doctors may take advantage of it and choose the easiest way to treat patients instead of the best way, leading to difficulty in enforcement of the law.
In addition to the difficulty in execution, legalization of euthanasia is not ethical as well for medical workers, the patient’s family and patients themselves. Since it is medical workers’ bounden duty to prolong patients’ life, executing euthanasia can be considered as betraying the Hippocratic oath for medical workers [2]. Moreover, as for the patients’ family, it is also not easy for them to make such a decision to “kill” their own family members, especially in Chinese families. Deeply influenced by Confucianism, Chinese people’s value is basically based on filial piety. According to a survey, 56.3% of the participators agree that family members should try their best to rescue their relatives to exhibit their filial piety no matter there exists any hope [7]. Traditional Chinese ethics holds that junior generation should keep their parents’ company until their death. Any behavior intending to accelerate one’s parents’ death would be regarded as worst offense of rebellion and condemned by the public. In addition, as an old Chinese saying states that “anyone do not have the right to hurt ourselves since everything on our body come from our parents, and this is the origin of filial piety”, accepting euthanasia also goes against filial piety even for terminally ill patients. In brief, euthanasia cannot be considered as an ethical practice for medical workers, patients’ family and patients themselves in Chinese context.
Apart from ethical problems, legalization of euthanasia also tramples on the sanctity of life. It is widely accepted that life is the most precious property of us. Albert Schweitzer [8], a German philosophy, who first put forward the concept of reverence of life, describes different levels of people’s reverence of life as a criteria of judging the civilization of human society. A typical example of that is the child policy in Nazi German where all babies with congenital deficiency would be put to death. In this case,...

Find Another Essay On Whether euthanasia should be legalized for terminally ill patients in China

Positive Arguments for Euthanasia: Touching on ethical views and the views of terminally ill patients

514 words - 2 pages challenge these beliefs with euthanasia would be to go against their faith in God.Euthanasia will be debated for many years to come. With the information set forth hopefully the beneficial aspects of euthanasia have been made clear. It is important to remember that treatments of physical symptoms are only part of the problem. Mental, social, and spiritual pains all add to the load that a terminally ill patient carries.

Euthanasia: Not Just for the Terminally Ill

1436 words - 6 pages Euthanasia: Not Just for the Terminally Ill      Euthanasia or assisted suicide would not only be available to people who are terminally ill. This popular misconception is what this essay seeks to correct. There is considerable confusion on this point, perhaps further complicated by statements in the media.   There are two problems here - the definition of "terminal" and the changes that have already taken place to extend

Medical Decisions for Incapacitated or Terminally ill Patients

978 words - 4 pages relative appears down the road, or if the patient is no longer incapacitated, then we will allow them to choose what treatment should be made. Terminally ill patients usually require 24-hour care. They may need to live in specific facilities or need to have a nurse in their home at all times. All these costs add up quickly and can be pretty expensive. The funds for terminally ill patients should remain high and even throughout all patients. If the

Euthanasia: Should Not be Legalized in Canada?

977 words - 4 pages According to Longman dictionary euthanasia means “the deliberate killing of a person who is very ill ‘(terminal illness)’ and going to die, in order to stop them suffering.” There are two different types of euthanasia; active and passive. Euthanasia is legalized in some parts of the world like Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium, Oregon, Montana and Washington. Euthanasia should not be legalized in Canada because it is not lawful, ethical, and

Should euthanasia be legalized in the UK.

1361 words - 6 pages amended to allow assisted suicide in certain cases and 67% of people think that doctors in particular, should have the legal power to end the life of a terminally ill patient if they request it ( The law currently holds a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment for assisting someone to commit suicide and up to life imprisonment for euthanasia itself. Despite this, at least 18000 people a year are helped to die by doctors who

Euthanasia Should Not Be Legalized

2605 words - 11 pages not wrong for a person to ask others to help him achieve his right. Moreover, the desire to include one’s physician in carrying out a decision to end one’s life can be viewed as an extension of the natural reliance of terminally ill patients on their physicians for help with most aspects of their illness, as well as reasonable mechanism to ensure that they do not become more disabled and burdensome to their family or friends by attempting

Euthanasia Should Not Be Legalized

1248 words - 5 pages they feel themselves like a burden. In addition, people must create opportunities for the other ones, who suffer a disease, not legalized euthanasia and make them think about death. Some deaths prevent medical research, because if there is not any new diseases, doctors will study less about new topics. Once someone, who suffers from a new kind of disease, accepts euthanasia, there will be no possibility to study about her/his disease. As a final

Terminally Ill Patients and Physician Assisted Suicide

697 words - 3 pages Terminally Ill Patients and Physician Assisted Suicide For hundreds of years a doctor was sworn into practice with the Oath of Hippocrates. Although in the present time parts of the oath have oath has come into question on how they should be interrupted. "To do no harm," the question is what does one consider harm? With our modern technology in medicine our medical community has the ability to prolong a person's life for quite awhile

How euthanasia should be legalized

773 words - 3 pages committing suicide they can die with dignity. Euthanasia should be legalized so people who are suffering from pain can die in high spirits. Euthanasia can end painful human suffrage.Euthanasia helps bring a peaceful and painless death. The patients are put to sleep by means of lethal injections. First the patient is put through anesthetic drugs and then the patient is either given pentobarbital for rapid unconsciousness and death, or potassium

The Case for Euthanasia, Should Physician-Assisted Suicide be Legalized?

1534 words - 6 pages not the patient has the freedom to choose whether or not to prolong their life even though it may consist of pain and suffering. In answer to this question, proponents of physician-assisted suicide, most notably, Dr. Jack Kevorkian, are of the opinion that not only should patients be able to abstain from treatment, but if they have a terminal and/or extremely painful condition, they should be able to seek out the assistance of a doctor in order

  Three reasons that prostitution should not be legalized in China

1952 words - 8 pages rights of prostitutes and this is what most developed countries such as Canada and Germany do. This topic has been debated on the internet until today. Although it is true that more and more countries in the world begin to legalize prostitution, prostitution should still not be legalized in China since it will not benefit society at all but cause many other problems. Firstly, since lots of Chinese have little consciousness about law, legalizing

Similar Essays

Should Physician Assisted Suicide Be Legal For Terminally Ill Patients To Engage In?

1396 words - 6 pages Should Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Legal For Terminally Ill Patients to Engage In?Critical Analysis EssayThe use of physician-assisted suicide in order to relieve dire pain and suffering has been a highly controversial practice that comes with a long history. In his award-winning documentary film, How to Die in Oregon, Peter D. Richardson examines the issue first handily, targeting the "Death with Dignity Act" which had been passed in the

Should Physician Assisted Suicide Be Legal For Terminally Ill Patients To Engage In?

1396 words - 6 pages Should Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Legal For Terminally Ill Patients to Engage In?Critical Analysis EssayThe use of physician-assisted suicide in order to relieve dire pain and suffering has been a highly controversial practice that comes with a long history. In his award-winning documentary film, How to Die in Oregon, Peter D. Richardson examines the issue first handily, targeting the "Death with Dignity Act" which had been passed in the

Working Towards Compassion For Terminally Ill Patients— Legalization Of Euthanasia

4111 words - 16 pages , voluntary euthanasia is legalized but the patients do not have to be adults or terminally ill and only doctors could assist in the death of the patients. Out of the 10,000 requests for euthanasia in the Netherlands, only about 3,800 are performed, making about three percent of deaths on the Netherlands acts of euthanasia (1). Out of the three percent, more than eighty percent have cancer and are diagnosed with less than a month of life (Torr 2). If

Euthanasia: Only For The Terminally Ill

1629 words - 7 pages afford, patients shouldn't have to suffer, and personal decision, they should be about to choose what to do and as a result that is why euthanasia should be legalized in massachusetts for the terminally ill. Medicines and surgeries are expensive and so is health insurance. If a patient is suffering for a while and in an uncomfortable position in life for the end of their life its their own decision to say when they want to die at that point.